الولايات المتحدة: مقاضاة أحد الفنادق لممارسة تمييز ديني ضد موظفة محجبة

- خبر من مصادر إنجليزية.

قامت مؤسسة "لجنة تكافؤ الفرص الوظيفية" الحقوقية المدنية برفع قضية ضد الشركة المسؤولة عن فندق "Albuquerque"؛ لتعرض "صفية عبدالله" للتمييز الديني لرفض الشركة توظيفها لارتدائها الحجاب، وخرق القانون بعدم توفيق أوضاعها الدينية، ثم الانتقام منها لرفضها الخضوع لممارسة التمييز.

وقد طالبت اللجنة الحقوقية المحكمة بحكم مناسب، إضافة إلى دفع الرواتب وتعويض مالي وكذلك المصاريف التأديبية.

وقد أكدت "ماري ج.أونيل" - المدعي العام لمنطقة "فونيكس" - أن المحكمة في مقاطعتها تأخذ قضايا التمييز الديني بحزم، وخاصة مع سهولة توفيق الأوضاع الدينية إذا ما قوبلت بتعنت أصحاب الأعمال بسبب الخرافات أو الصور النمطية. المصدر: شبكة الألوكة.

يرجى الإشارة إلى المصدر عند نقل الخبر - شبكة الألوكة.

الخبر من مصدره الأصلي:

MCM Elegante Hotel Sued by EEOC for Religious Discrimination and Retaliation

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – 704 HTL Operating, LLC and Investment Corporation of America, doing business as MCM Elegante Hotel in Albuquerque, violated federal law by subjecting a Muslim woman to religious discrimination and to retaliation for opposing the discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it filed on September 21, 2011.

In its suit, the EEOC said that the hotel failed to accommodate Safia Abdullah’s request to work wearing a hijab, a head scarf worn by Muslim women for religious purposes. In addition, the EEOC alleges that the hotel either failed to hire Abdullah or discharged her because of her religion and/or because she engaged in the protected conduct of opposing discrimination, including requesting religious accommodation.

Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on religion and retaliation for opposition to discrimination. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico (EEOC v. 704 HTL Operating, LLC and Investment Corporation of America   Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00845) after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement through its conciliation process.

“We will vigorously prosecute cases of religious discrimination throughout our district, including claims that involve the employer’s refusal to provide reasonable accommodation for an individual’s religious beliefs,” said Regional Attorney Mary Jo O’Neill of the EEOC’s Phoenix District Office, which has jurisdiction over Arizona, Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico and Utah. “We are particularly concerned when the accommodation requested is easy to provide and the employer appears to have reacted to myths or stereotypes about a religion.”

The lawsuit asks the court to order the employer to provide Abdullah with appropriate relief, including back wages and compensatory and punitive damages, and a permanent injunction enjoining the company from engaging in any further religious discrimination or retaliation. The EEOC also asks the court to order the company to institute and carry out policies and practices that eradicate and prevent religious discrimination and retaliation in the workplace.

EEOC Deputy District Director Elizabeth Cadle said, “We will not tolerate religious discrimination or retaliation against employees who simply request the right to work with reasonable accommodation of their religion”.